Scott Sauyet to Jason Guidone
To: jason.guidone@proton.me Subject: A question from a neighboring town, and an offer to publish your answer in full Dear Mr. Guidone, I live in Andover, so I will not be voting in the 19th, but two of the towns you hope to represent, Hebron and Marlborough, share the 55th House District with mine, and you live in one of them. I write about local government at andoverct.info, and I should say plainly that I co-chair the Andover Democratic Town Committee. This letter is my own, sent in my own name. I have one question, and I would rather put it to you directly than guess at the answer. Will you publicly disavow Donald Trump? By that I mean a statement in your own name that he does not represent you and does not have your support. Not a comment on a single policy, and not a statement about the party in general. I am asking the same question, in the same words, of Ryan Fazio, Steve Weir, and Jenn Jennings. Whatever you send me I will publish in full and unedited, with the question and the date, at http://andoverct.info/reports/ahm/disavowal/. If you would rather answer somewhere else, in the Rivereast or on your own page, that is fine. Point me to it and I will link it. If you have already answered this publicly and I have missed it, send me the link and I will say so. I plan to publish on September 17, 2026 and to update through the election. There is no deadline. An answer at any point gets added. Thank you for your time. Scott Sauyet Andover scott.sauyet@gmail.com
Source
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:26:15 -0400 Message-ID: <CAMpcBwrO5xQAk62pdn5MFhNXp8vdP_EqRCjOuAyGCE4kBOKHGA@mail.gmail.com> Subject: A question from a neighboring town, and an offer to publish your answer in full From: Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> To: jason.guidone@proton.me
The headers doing evidentiary work are shown. 2 other header fields were withheld — routing records, which carry originating IP addresses, and spam-filter scores, which characterize a sender. The full block is retained and will be produced if the authenticity of this message is disputed.
A DKIM signature is strong evidence that a message arrived as sent, not proof: verifying one needs the body byte-exact and the sending domain's key still published, and campaign keys rotate.